![]() What I agree with most, is diamondseeker's reply about diamonds just under a magic weight giving the best value.įor the aspects of brightness (brilliance), fire and scintillation, I would like to go a bit more into basics: If I understand the question correctly, I think I have to correct part of all the statements above. So knowing what she loves is THE biggest factor aside from your budget. Some girls want more elaborate settings with smaller diamonds, and others want the biggest possible diamond in a simple solitaire setting. However, sometimes people value being able to say that my ring is 1 ct or 2 cts, so it depends on what she, particularly, values for her ring. 90 is going to be less than 1 ct (of equal cut and specs), 1.8-1.9x will be less than 2 cts, etc. There's a big difference between living in Beverly Hills versus small town in the south or midwest, for example.Īs far as better value goes, going just under a carat mark is usually the best way to get greater size while avoiding the mark-up of the next carat mark. Number two is what is worn in her social circle and family and the size she'd be most comfortable with. What determines the best size to buy? Number one is your budget. An ideal cut stone looks fabulous in a halo, solitaire, or other setting. But carat weight and size have zero to do with the fire, brilliance, and sparkle. There are other factors such as bad clarity that might detract from that. Re: Which carat size is best for fire and brilliance sparkleĬut is what makes a diamond beautiful. Ask our PriceScope members and industry experts for a second opinion or get lost in the thousands of user-shared diamond and jewelry images for inspiration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |